A friend writes: “I am sending a letter of resignation to
Minnesota Public Radio, to the three major networks, CNN. The New Yorker, The New York Times and The Washington Post in anticipation of
allegations that I might harass someone if I were hired to become part of their
staffs. Harassment is viral and I don't know if I can be certain my autonomic
nervous system is to be relied on in situations where there are other bodies in
an enclosed space. After all, it is by definition, autonomic, right?” People
who are suffering from illnesses which make them particularly vulnerable to
infection have to be quarantined in germ free rooms in which they run no risk
of contamination. That is what is slowly happening in America today. The only
way to avoid allegations of harassment is quarantine. Who knows if
the next handshake a firing? Of course terrible things have occurred; many men and women have been victims of ugly assaults on their bodies and dignities. But such wrong doing is always how massive counterreactions begin. And these sometimes match or even exceed the injustices they are out to correct. In one view the deleterious effects of the Versailles Treaty catalyzed the rise of fascism in Germany. Doesn’t anyone remember the House
Un-American Activities Committee and the
blacklist and the tarring and featherings that are an ignominious part of
American history? The alacrity with which whole careers and lifetimes are
disposed of, without even a semblance of due process and the self-righteous
outcries for revenge, all reek of lynch mob style justice? What about Big Brother and Newspeak? This is like Stalinist Russia or present day Russia for that matter. Why is no one
speaking up? Why is no one arguing for a reasoned response in which each case is dealt with separately and with a modicum of equanimity that precludes hysterical rushes to judgement?
Thursday, November 30, 2017
Wednesday, November 29, 2017
Misery on the Orient Express
Misery loves company goes the old saw and there's a great
truth to the aphorism. Most of the star-studded cast of the latest doomed version of Murder on the Orient Express (including Kenneth Branagh, who also directed, William DaFoe, Johnny Depp,
Michelle Pfeiffer and Judi Dench) which might have been retitled Ship of Fools, if it hadn’t taken place
on the train, look miserably at ease with each other. And it has nothing to do with Agatha Christie’s
backstory (the kind of murder going on in this version has to do with lousy
direction and an even worse script). But the
derailed train, where the mystery unfolds, is a wonderful metaphor for human
foibles and frailty itself. Imagine your train being hit by an avalanche and
being stranded precariously over a snow filled gorge. That’s the moment at
which people come together and let down their armor. It’s almost more fun to be
the victim of something than to simply be one of the competitors on the playing
field of life. You know how your heart goes out to people when they’re in
trouble and how much more preferable it is to be with someone who's going
through something then the self-same person imperviously pursuing his or her business with a shit-eating grin on their faces. Now double that and you attain an
equanimity that can only result when the chips are down for everyone. That
might not have been what Agatha Christie was after when she wrote her mystery,
but she couldn’t have foreseen what a lousy adaptation can do to bring actors
together.
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
Loving Vincent
Animation is a unique form of cartoon art, to the extent that
it's so capable of expressing realistic forms of human emotion. There’s a huge
difference between Popeye for example
and the Princess Mononoke. The
enormous range of animation is illustrated in Dorota Kobiela and Hugh
Welchman’s Loving Vincent, a gargantuan project which employed 115 artists to create the 65,000 paintings of which
the animation is comprised. The fact that the animations themselves are
faithful to the art of their subject, only
increases their resonance. There's an almost nuclear effect to the shimmering
images which are detonated by Van Gogh’s signature brush strokes. The movie, of
course, needed a plot, and the central story which takes place a year after the
painter’s death, deals in an almost forensic manner with the question of his
suicide and whether he was suffering from what today might be termed bi- polar
disorder in which a precipitous mood shift brought about tragic results or
whether he was in fact “soul murdered,” by the jealous Dr. Gachet, who was also
the model for one of van Gogh’s most famous and highly valued paintings. What's peculiar and enchanting is to stare into animated faces of the cast of
characters in looking for clues, though the story for all its twists, turns out
to be a fairly open and shut case, at least in the filmmakers’ formulation of
events.
Monday, November 27, 2017
Emotional Crumbs
![]() |
Robert Mugabe (photo:www. kremlin.ru) |
Friday, November 24, 2017
Delirious: Art at the Limits of Reason, 1950-1980
![]() |
"Ladder" by Yayoi Kusama (photograph by Hallie Cohen) |
On one wall of Delirious:Art at the Limits of Reason, l950-1980 currently on exhibit at the Met/Breuer the curators quote Joan Didion thusly “An affect of vertigo and nausea does not seem to me an inappropriate response to the summer of l968.” Delirious is divided up in to sections entitled “Vertigo,” “Excess,” Nonsense” and “Twisted,” and the strategy is to present works that subvert and undermine the viewer’s initial perception of an ordered universe. It’s a theme show like the recent Unfinished: Thoughts Left Visible, employing pieces by a variety of artists to propagate an idea. Jennifer Bartlett’s “Fixed /Vanishing” (l970) creates an orderly grid whose bottom line is ultimately a question. A copy of Semiotext (e) the magazine that derived from Sylvere Lotringer’s conference “Schizo-Culture: A Revolution in Desire” features works by Kathy Acker, Jack Smith, Lee Breuer, Gilles DeLeuze, William Burroughs, Philip Glass, Jean-Francois Lyotard and Richard Foreman--luminaries of the period under examination who explored the fracture of consciousness.The sculptor Robert Smithson (1938-73) who is represented describes himself as a "keeper of derangement." Yayoi Kusama's contribution which features penises and high-heeled shoes hanging from a pyramid shaped "Ladder" (1963) is the perfect accompaniment to Hannah Wilke’s kneaded eraser vulvas which shatter the calm surface of postcard art in “Grant’s Tomb” (1976) and “East Falls, New York” (l975). Not surprisingly Beckett, a major figure in the period, is an influence on a number of the artists in the show including Philip Guston, “The Street” (1970) and Bruce Nauman whose “Slow Angle Walk (Beckett Walk)” from l968 is an essay in absurdist perseveration. "In-Out Anthropophagy" (1973-4) by the Brazillian artist Anna Maria Maiolino is a video that against hearkens back to Beckett’s Not I (and the horror struck nurse in the famous Odessa Steps scene in Eisenstein’s Potemkin) by presenting a faceless gaping mouth, in this case not screaming but masticating.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)