Courbet's "The Origin of the World" |
Friday, September 30, 2016
Pornosophy: Nudity
Thursday, September 29, 2016
The After Hours
photograph by Francis Levy |
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Trump v. Hatshepsut
Hatshepsut (photo:Postdlf) |
Much has been made of Hillary Clinton being the first
American president, but lest we over value this achievement let’s remember the
famous Hatshepsut who was the second woman Pharaoh. You can view her in the
Met’s Egyptian wing and before her there was Sobekneferu. In modern times we
have of course had Golda Meir, Israel’s fifth prime minister, Margaret
Thatcher, Angela Merkell, the
chancellor of Germany and Britain's current prime minister, Theresa May. Whether Helen of Troy was a political figure or figurehead
remains to be seen, but she certainly would qualify as being one of Hegel’s
figures of World Historical importance, having caused The Trojan War. And how
would some of these famous woman leaders have fared against Donald Trump in a
debate? Imagine Trump facing off against Hatshepsut. Even though you can’t get
a good handle on a piece of stone, you get the feeling that the famous Egyptian
pharaoh was unmoving and imperturbable. Would Trump have dared to accuse her of not having the "stamina" for the job? Her steely gaze would undoubtedly have
shaken the billionaire real estate developer’s resolve. How would Trump have
handled Meir who is not exactly what you’d call a babe, when she began to
rattle him with her prodigious intelligence? Would he have attacked her
appearance? And then there’s Margaret Thatcher whose character was played by
Meryl Streep. She was hardly a slouch and by the way who should play
Hillary in the movie version of the life of our first female president and who
Trump, Robert Redford--due to the hairdo?
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
The Debate
second Kennedy/Nixon debate (photo: United Press International ) |
Monday, September 26, 2016
Trump Motors
It’s by no means berating Donald Trump to say that he looks
like a car salesman and it’s not to cast any aspersions on car salesmen to say
that Donald Trump looks like one of them. But if you were going to engage in profiling
wouldn’t the blown dried hair and the portly physique, perhaps covered by a
shark skin suit and patent leather loafers, fit the type? Indeed some of the
turbulence of Trump’s personality and that part of him which seems to be
perpetually about to go out of control
may result from his missing his calling. You’ve heard of the four humors,
bile, phlegm, yellow bile and blood. Could Trump’s misplaced energies have caused
a war between phlegm and bile? Just place him in a Chrysler show room and all
the blusteriness, the malaproprisms and misinformation will all soon
make sense. He’ll be in his proper habitat. Trump Motors even sounds like the
name of a dealership, no? Looking at this another way, Donald Trump has never
really broken away from his oedipal relationship with his father, who quashed his
son’s great potential to run an automobile dealership by luring him into real
estate. And then came leading Trump University and finally the presidency. Who
the hell knows how this last happened (though Ike was president of Columbia
before he landed in The White House)?
But now he’s stuck again and the shoe obviously doesn’t fit the foot.
Once the elections are over and he loses to Hillary, he may secretly breathe a
sigh of relief when he realizes he is now free to embrace the profession for
which he was always destined. He will become the greatest car salesman this
country has ever known.
Friday, September 23, 2016
Too Far to Go or Going too Far?
Klaus Mann, Staff Sergeant US Fifth Army (photo: United States Fifth Army) |
In her review of Frederic Spotts Cursed Legacy, The Tragic Life of Klaus Mann, Anna Katharina
Schaffner quotes the author and Mann himself as follows: “In his diary Klaus
complained that his father’s 'general lack of interest in human beings is
especially strong towards me.'” Schaffner also quotes Spotts thusly, “Klaus Mann
was six times jinxed. A son of Thomas Mann. A homeless exile. A drug addict. A
writer unable to publish in his native tongue. A not-so-gay gay. Someone
haunted by all his life by a fascination with death.” But the case of Thomas Mann raises another question, that of the camouflage of humanism under which
artistic depredations are allowed to fester. A great writer may have an
exorbitant appetite for life while at the same time being life’s deadly enemy.
Look at Tolstoy who early on exercised his doit du seigneur
with his serfs while ending his last days, abandoning his wife and dying in
Astopovo railway station. Norman Mailer famously stabbed his wife Adele on the
eve of his candidacy for Mayor. V.S. Naipaul’s sadistic treatment of his
mistress which involved beatings and disfigurement has been documented in Patrick French’s biography. And what can we say about Picasso. His portraits of
the many women in his life appear to be the kiss of death; when he could no longer “palate” them they became works of art. It’s no
revelation to learn that successful creative people often possess enormous egos which sucks up experience like a black hole light. When one reads Too Far to Go the short
stories that comprise Updike’s eulogy to his first marriage, one wonders if the
tristesse of the break up, so beautifully rendered, didn’t, in fact, represent
the author sacrificing life for the sake of art. In this view creative work is
a form of taxidermy, in which the skinned animal is used to make the head which
hangs over the fireplace.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)