1883 performance of Ibsen's Ghosts |
Is a side effect of capitalism inhibition? If you remember
Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, the habits of blooming capitalists include a certain
frugality, which by definition would imply an avoidance of immediate gratification. It doesn't take much of a leap to conclude that wealth goes hand in hand with repression. If you learned your lessons
well (and hence manifest as one of the saved who’s been given God’s grace) you
were going to be a person who was wary of the pitfalls of pleasure. Put
another way hedonism is a little like using up the gas in your tank with sexual
libertinism and promiscuousness finding their monetary equivalent in borrowing.
What indeed would Weber’s proto capitalists have thought of today’s huge
deficit economies that are constantly financed with more borrowing? Of
course, socialist economies have no monopoly on pleasure; the dictatorship of
the proletariat has yet to produce its Xanadu. Conversely, there have been
numerous capitalists whose appetites would hardly have made them exemplars of
the Christian values. But sensibilities leave
their residues. The repressive society Ibsen describes in a play like Ghosts can be seen as a product of the manners and mores
Weber was writing about in his classic tome. The price of “success” in this
dark Nordic world is disease--on both a physical and spiritual level.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.