Joseph Jefferson as Rip van Winkle (photo by Napoleon Sarony) |
There are certain old people who are praised for their
voracious appetite for life. They can’t see or hear. They certainly can’t fuck
and they're steadily draining the resources of their already cash strapped
baby boomer children. Is their desire to live for the sake of it necessarily a
good thing which should be praised, the way you praise a child who had done his homework? Should old people
necessarily be rewarded simply for their stubborn insistence on living, when many
young people who are more worthy candidates for life, have life unjustly taken
from them by the ravages of cancer, by accidents or merely from one of the
occupational hazards of being young and full of the desire for oblivion, the
overdose? Sometimes when you see one of these drooling geezers with their
walkers, you’d wish they could give up even a few years of their longevity to
some poor kid who dies from say the disease of progeria, whose symptom is premature
aging. Scientists may never discover the secret of immortality, but perhaps
they will find a way that older people can sell part of their timeshares to
those whose youth will enable them to make better use of their bodies. Youth
may be wasted on the young, but the purpose of life is sometimes misunderstood by gerontophiles who see nothing wrong with aging opera buffs, who have managed to get coveted seats for Don Giovanni, only
to sleep through the entire performance. "An
aged man is but a paltry thing/ a tattered cloak upon a stick, unless/ Soul clap
its hands and sing..." says Yeats in "Sailing to Byzantium." But what if the time for song has past?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.