There is ludic which refers to play. A Luddite, a person
who resists technology and innovation. Luddite derives from someone named Ned
Ludd who flew off the handle and broke some stocking frames. HIs name was appropriated by those who had a gripe with industrialization. It's doubtful that Ludd would have taken to Marx’s early writings (the 1844 manuscripts) which deal with the kind of alienation that
derives from the division of labor--if he had lived long enough to read them.
But there's a direct connection between ludic and Luddite if we remember that homo ludens is man at play and the title
of a book by the Dutch cultural historian, Johan Huizinga (and that Ludens, by the way, is the name of the well-known brand of cough drops). There’s of course
Yvetushenko the famous Russian poet and the nonsense contrarian rhyme “not to
Shenko.” But what about outstinct? If there is an instinct which is a natural
or biological drive, there must be the opposite which accounts for all that
does not derive from the ANS or autonomic nervous system. If you are not
depending on your instincts you certainly must fall back on your outstincts,
which comprise everything else, consciousness, mind and the kind of thinking
upon which reason depends emanating from the cerebral cortex. Instinct is
usually associated with what is known as lower brain or limbic activities,
where emotion resides. Words at play, logos ludens?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.