"White on White" by Kazimir Malevich (1918) |
if the universe isn’t
recoiling and fulfilling the biblical “ashes to ashes, dust to dust.” And is
that where God comes in, in the positing of things which are unfathomable? On
the most basic level nothingness connotes no mass or volume and if something is
nothing it would also be impalpable and thus invisible. But is the absence of
anything really nothing? And one wonders if there are whole
universes of nothingness, which may not
have previously occupied the multiverse as we know it, but which function
like parallel universes to the extent they have a notational existence, in
spite of the fact that they don’t have any properties of being. Is a vacuum nothing? And does it lie on the precipice of
being everything by virtue of the fact that a large enough one could eventually be the
repository of all that is. Let's head back 13.8 billion years before that first
explosion. There's no light, though like the parable of the branch falling in
the forest and no one hearing it, it’s hard to conceive of darkness without
somebody there to perceive and in effect there's no space since space is a
function of matter. And where does that leave time. Can you have time without
space? And if not, is this what nothing really is?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.