“Hillary sucks but not like Monica,” was apparently one of
the tee shirts that was being sold at the Republican convention. It’s a free
country and no one is going to get too far with a liability suit, particular public figures. What would
the charge actually be anyway? When you say someone sucks it generally means
that you don’t approve of them and that's not something for which any jury is
going to offer an award. Sucking of course can also refer to oral sex, but is
it really libelous to accuse either Hillary or Monica Lewinsky of having oral
sex? Oral sex was up until 2003 still illegal in many states but in Lawrence v.
Texas the Supreme Court ruled against sodomy laws. So saying that someone sucks
is not accusing them of an illegal act. In fact to say that a woman or man
sucks in our current climate is generally considered to be flattering as it
means that they would make an excellent sexual partner. Those people whose
opposition to Hillary Clinton is reflected in the former meaning of the word
would in fact probably not go along with the notion that Hillary sucks like
Monica since that would be too flattering to her and as for Monica the latter
use of the term is just like adding another notch to her belt. So what is all
the fuss about? Using two meanings of the word "sucks" in a sentence that
contains the name of the Democratic nominee for president and the woman with
whom her husband cheated on her is clever and the writer may be applauded for
his or her turn of phrase. But at the end of the day, is anyone going to wear
this shirt?
Monday, August 1, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.