"Judgement of Solomon" by Gustave Dore |
What is the perfect relationship? Plato’s ideal forms were
only shadows on the wall of a cave, but what would be the closest embodiment of
the ideal in the real—as far as human congress is concerned? Is the Solomonic
model of complete equanimity what we would advise to youthful newcomers to the
relationship business? Love and work were the two pillars of human existence
for Freud and the fulfillment of these two callings are the challenge (and burden)
facing every generation as it reaches maturity. If you remember in the argument
over maternity, Solomon offered to cut the baby in half, but on a less dramatic
level you're faced with the prospect of some degree of sacrifice when it comes
to living with another person whose needs and desires are not always a mirror of
your own. The murdered baby is a metaphor for the kind of intransigence
indicated by the slogan “take my way or the highway.” How many times does one
threaten the very existence of a relationship by electing to be right rather than
happy? How many times are you ready to sever the baby and destroy everything
for the sake of an ego which is doomed to die anyway? However, equanimity is an
Enlightenment view of human existence. It’s predicated on the notion that equality can actually be
legislated. How do we account those animal instincts that are an ineluctable
part of appetite and desire? Reason alone doesn’t explain the irrational element
of attraction that ignites an interaction in the first place. How many times
have well meaning friends tried to make a shidduch, the Yiddish word for matchmaking,
only to find that neither party is willing to conform to what is essentially an
idea? Yes it’s nice to dabble in reason, but the road to hell is paved with
good intentions—and the humanistic equivalent of arranged marriages.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.