18h century parchment by Jekuthiel Sofer |
“More sinned against than sinner, “ goes the old expression,
but what is sin and what the relationship of the sinner to the sinned? In some
ways it sounds a little like the phenomenological notion of intention. The
subjective individual can have intention to the object, but inanimate objects
have no intention and express no volition. “An immoral act considered to be a
transgression against divine law, “ is how sin is defined by the on-line dictionary, but you don’t sin
against the self-same table or chair and a table or a chair certainly can't be guilty of any sins. You don’t sin against objects and objects cannot sin against you. You sin
against people who possess their own intentions and in so doing are sinning against God, if you happen to believe in one. Thus my intention is to
live, but when you decide to kill me, you eradicate my ability to fulfill my goal. The same is true of the biblical injunction about coveting they
neighbor’s wife. The neighbor wants to be married and enjoy the company of his
wife, but you get in the way of that when you covet and then have the
wherewithal to actually commit adultery. “More sinned against than sinner” thus
conveys the nuance of two bodies in motion, two individuals who have equal and
opposite intentions, one of which is sinful and the other of which may contain
sinful elements, but is in the end less sinful. The married man may be guilty
of the sin of lust, yet the neighbor who commits adultery with that man’s wife may
be deemed even more sinful to the extent that he moves from an idea to an
action. Still there's something ambiguous about all of this. After their fall
from grace, Adam and Eve, by definition, lived in a state of sin, since they
had lost their innocence. Adam and Eve represent mankind as we know it, filled
with sin and hiding their nakedness because of their sense of shame. But to
quote Orwell in Animal Farm “all
animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” Individual men
may seek to prove the notion that they have found grace a la the Protestant
ethic that Max Weber talks about. Yet there are no absolutes. It depends from
what point of view you are looking and with what intention, when you set out to
reach a verdict. Sin is more consonant with relativity theory than Newtonian physics considering its more rigid view of space and time. Jurors are perpetually faced with these kinds of situations.
A crime or sin may have been committed, but the person against whom the action
took place may have been sinning themselves, as in the case of the wife who in
a moment of rage kills her abusive husband. In cases like this jurors must
adjudicate who is the sinner and who the one sinned against when the facts are
open to differing interpretations.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.