What's The Crime of Monsieur Lange (1936)? The answer might
not be the murder which the Renoir film, concluding its revival at Film
Forum today, portrays, but art. "Art is a lie that makes us realize truth," said Picasso. Art, artifice, factitiousness are the palette in
which the film operates and the whole making of the work of art which is one of
the film's subjects is corrupt from beginning to end. Admittedly, within the plot
is a populist uprising, but it does little to take away from the commodification
of the creative impulse which the film describes. At one point Lange (Rene
Lefevre) who produces a tale set in Arizona, where he’s never been, becomes
enraged with his publisher, Batala (the swaggering Jules Berry), for some
advertisements which have been interjected into his narrative. The ploy will
probably receive a jaded response from most contemporary viewers, who would
regard the gaffe as a textbook example of product placement. There are some witty
bits like one in which Batala who's presumed dead, before he’s actually shot by Lange, is disguised as a priest and comments “Life is a question of
habit. You get used to it.” Lange himself complains about the backdrops that are
used to create the illusion of the West for his writing. If there is a movie
made, he wants something more realistic, but you might say this early Renoir
success, with its story within a story structure, is as far from so-called
realism as filmmaking can get.
Thursday, November 23, 2017
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Pornosophy: Was Madame Bovary a Nyphomaniac?
Nymphomania and satyriasis may not make strange bedfellows. However, when these two paraphilias are addressed they're generally dealt with as deviations in behavior brought about by psychological issues.
Parents who compete with or over-stimulate their children have an undeniable
effect on the formation of these kind of symptoms. But insatiable sexual urges
may also be regarded as perverse form of romanticism. Couldn’t Flaubert’s
Madame Bovary be understood as a classic case of nymphomania? Bovarysm, the
literary term used to describe Emma’s condition is usually regarded as an
expression of the romantic agony? If
Emma had been able to make a life with Rodolfe, her wealthy lover, iplain she would likely have become bored. She’s
filled with an insatiable longing that also extends to material things (she
gets into debt with a manipulative businessman, Lheureux). As a classic romantic Emma
Bovary is more in love with the potentiality of what has yet to be than
the stolid intractable nature of that which already exists. Of course Bovary is
a literary creation, but her promiscuity, existing as it does on both
a psychological and esthetic level, opens a window both on the nature of her
sexuality and her imaginative yearnings and life.
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
The Vegetarian
The central character of Han Kang’s The Vegetarian,
Yeong-hye, is reminiscent of Kafka’s A Hunger Artist. At the beginning of the
novel she’s distinguished only by her ordinariness and passivity, but it’s the
assertion of self-deprivation from meat that becomes a revelation. Meat
literally disgusts Kang’s character, but as she withers away, losing weight and
her mind in the face of the disapprobation of her husband and father (who
actually attacks her), she, like Kafka's character, exudes the power of the anorexic personality. So
there are two sometimes conflicting issues at the center of this acclaimed
novel and ones that are at times in conflict with each other. To choose a
vegetarian lifestyle is obviously not tantamount to starvation, but the
brilliance of the novel is the way it actually defies pathology, camouflaging an inner drive with a
social act. However, what The Vegetarian also has in common with the Kafka
masterpiece is the aestheticizing of Yeong-hye’s condition. Art is Yeong-hye's salvation, even though she's simply the subject of an artist's work. It's her brother in law, a video artist, who colludes in Yeong-hye’s
resurrection, though he himself is barely conscious of his own motives when he first starts to
paint her body.You might think that a novel with a title like The
Vegetarian has an axe to grind. However, it’s just the opposite. The postures of the
characters actually become more inscrutable as the author weaves the
literary equivalent of a musical theme and variations on the calling described by her title.
Monday, November 20, 2017
Birdwatching: The Russian Oligarch
![]() |
| red-winged blackbird (photo: copyright 2008 Walter Siegmund) |
Russian Oligarchs are exotic birds. Take for instance
the Rybolovlev with its unique interests in potash and da Vinci. The Rybolovlev
Trust is the one which has reaped the profits from the windfall of the
Christie’s auction of “Salvator Mundi” for a whopping $450 million (which is
not birdfeed). That’s going to be one hefty bird, but many Oligarchs
resemble those Perdue Oven Stuffer roasters with their little plastic
thermometers in the breast that pop up when they’re ready to be devoured. You
may recall, Rybolovlev’s daughter, Ekaterina set a new record when she
purchased Sandy Weill’s penthouse at 15 Central Park West for $88 million. The
Rybolovlev is the kind of Oligarch that won’t settle for perching on a ledge or
nesting and/or fornicating on top of a high rise’s air conditioning unit.
Rybolovlevs are the kind of birds that are insiders and are only content when
they're able to warm themselves by a raging fire, with potash under the logs
and an auction price breaker over the mantle. Many Russians Oligarchs fly
south. For instance Dimitry Rybolovlev now lives in Monaco where he lines up
his ducks, amongst them a local soccer squad, AS Monaco. The pigeons in
Venice’s Saint Mark’s Square grow fat from all the crumbs thrown at them by
tourists, but the Rybolovlev is a different can of worms. You need more than a crust to attract a
Rybolovlev. In fact, you’d need a bread factory to get the attention of an
oligarch, considering all its trappings.
Friday, November 17, 2017
Is Your Self-Invention a Success?
![]() |
| "Man Ray in Paris" (photograph: Carl Van Vechten) |
You are constantly hearing that he or she is self-invented.
But is it necessarily a good thing? A self-invented person is ostensibly
someone who's not made in a mold. You have pound cakes that are baked in a
rectangular pan and coffee cakes which rise in those round gismos with the hole
in the center. Similarly when a son or daughter follows in their parents’
footsteps, they're not self-invented. Man Ray, the surrealist photographer and
artist, who lived in France, but was born in Philadelphia as Emmanuel Radnitzsky, the oldest child of a family of Jewish immigrants and ended up in Paris by way of Brooklyn, is
one of the greatest examples of self-invention. And then there were T.S. Eliot,
an American born poet who attended Harvard, but adopted a personality that was
tantamount to that of a landed English aristocrat, minus the titles, land and money
and Mary Astor, the only child of a pair of Quincy, Illinois school
teachers who scandalized Hollywood with all her affairs. Of course there are bad
examples of self-invention. Did you ever know kids who went off to France for
their junior year and returned behaving more French than the French? It wasn’t
only the Gauloises and the air of impudence, it was the fact that they talked in
broken English and no longer seemed to know what you were talking about. And
what about all the people who make a little money and develop airs, as if they
were born with a chrysalis of royalty despite their humble origins? You know
the type who was born on the wrong side of the tracks, but speaks the Queen’s
English and insists on correcting you when you say “him and me.” Yes there are
some really cool self-invented people, whose personalities are artworks, but in
general most people who escape their roots, in order to become somebody, turn
out to be colossal jerks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





