skip to main |
skip to sidebar

Amongst the many indignities of modern life is the ever
increasing demand to mince words. We live in the age of euphemism and you are
always forced to look over your shoulder to make sure there isn’t someone about
to flunk you for language failure. In France, you’d cry out “garcon” when
you wanted an espresso in a café. That was the only way to get it, but now
nobody calls out “waiter,” an appellation that probably is against the law in
California, where sex on a college campus currently requires “affirmative consent.” You have a “server,” who you have to wait for. California might be voted the most politically correct state in the
nation and one wonders how for instance “affirmative consent,” affects sales of
Victorian pornography like Leopold von Sacher-Masoch’s Venus in Furs (1870), whose characters
openly violate the statute and exhibit the kind of “triggering” behavior
that violates social norms in the state. “Blacks" replaced “negroes" and then
gave way to "people of color," but why is that last expression less offensive than "colored
people"? There are many theories, but a racist can easily use all the right words and still be talking through his ass. Once upon a time there were men who
referred to their women as hogs and who referred to mentally ill people as
psychos. Carroll O’Connor played a character called Archie Bunker who parodied such
thuggish behavior, but satire by way of hyperbole would probably not succeed in running the gauntlet
of today’s Newspeak. The intent of
all this policing is the idea that language affects action. Haven’t any of these protectors of the common good realized that "as if" behavior
can lead to the creation of a false self. When human beings are corralled into expressing themselves in certain ways in public, they depend on secret societies where they
are able to speak their minds. Steven Marcus wrote about book called The Other Victorians: A Study of Sexuality and Pornography in Mid-Nineteenth-Century England which dealt with the cultural schizophrenia that developed in
another age in which behavior was famously regulated. And then there’s the improv group, The Upright Citizens Brigade which is an equal opportunity offender, trashing all the
good intentions of our current iterations of the Women's Christian Temperance Union.

It used to be that spanking was a playful S&M activity, a holdover from the world that Steven Marcus described in The Other Victorians
. Regressive childhood associations were reinforced when the naughty boy or girl, having had his or her pants pulled down, got a red bottom after being bent over someone’s knee. It was all fairly mild stuff that played upon notions of good and bad. But the ante is going up when it comes to the sexually explicit material that can be found on the Internet. Gone are the fake squeals of pain and pleasure that used to accompany old-fashioned videos, with their nurses or police uniforms, depending on the side of the dominance/submission divide a porn actor or actress was portraying. What seems to be selling now are real tears. The fourth wall has broken down and many online sexual sites specialize in producing scenarios in which the “actors” fall apart on camera. For all the viewer knows this could be part of the script, in much the same way that the Stage Manager addresses the audience in Our Town
. Or it could be real. If an actress has had enough of being whipped, gang raped, gagged, facialized, asphyxiated, golden showered or expectorated on and she has a nervous breakdown on camera, all the better. The metteurs-en-scène, rather than feeling irritated by the divagation, seem to revel in it in the same way that credit card companies enjoy making more money when their customers fail to fulfill their obligations. Why do people enjoy seeing sex that appears to be a violation? Why do car drivers slow down to ogle horrible accidents? Why is this trend in pornography more prevalent today than it was in the past? Who knows?