![]() |
| Allen Grossman
At the end of the obituary of Allen Grossman
(“Allen Grossman, a Poet’s Poet and Scholar, Dies at 82,” NYT, 6/29/14), Bruce
Weber cites one of the deceased poets critical works, The Sighted Singer: Two Works on Poetry for Readers and Writers. Grossman is quoted as saying: “Poetry is a principle
of power invoked by all of us against our vanishing. The making of poems is a practice—a work human beings can do—in which civilization has invested some
part of its love of itself and the world. The poem is a trace of the will of
all persons to be known and to make known and therefore, to be at all.” Pretty
cool, huh? Sure what Grossman is saying about poetry could also be said about
many human endeavors. Having children who remember you after you’ve died is
one. The therapeutic encounter in which the psychiatrist or analyst becomes the
repository of memory is another, albeit a more fragile one since the vessel may
predecease the source of existential material with which it’s being filled.
Nothing is immortal. In billions of years when the earth dies, it’s unlikely
Shakespeare’s sonnets will be preserved in some form of celestial ether.
However, sure poetry is a bulwark against oblivion, with great poems rising
like cream in the vortex of time, to the point where they actually achieve the
illusion of immortality. And on a democratic note, don’t even human beings who
have never heard of the metaphysical poets or read Eliot’s “Tradition and the Individual Talent," have their fifteen minutes of fame? Don’t everyone’s s-mails, e-mails, don’t their inadvertent utterances, their cries of pain or joy,
at one time or other, rise to a certain level? Doesn’t everyone, in the course
of their miserable lives, write at least one great line of poetry that would have
lived after them if it had been recognized?
|
Showing posts with label Eliot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eliot. Show all posts
Friday, August 29, 2014
Death Slam
Friday, April 11, 2014
Pygmalionization
![]() |
| Pygmalion and Galatea by Falconet (1763), photo by Alex Bakharev |
In
“The Secret Auden,” (The New York Review of Books, 3/20/140 Ed Mendelson quotes the following passage from a lecture
Auden gave on Shakespeare’s sonnets, “Art may spill over from creating a world
of language into the dangerous and forbidden task of trying to create a human
being.” The essay is a brilliant meditation of Auden’s character in which
seemingly erratic and selfishly indulgent behavior belied a deeper generosity.
But the subject here is love which as we know doesn’t abide the reality principle,
depending as it does on idealization. How else can instinct navigate the shoals
of consciousness? Mendelson writes about Auden and his lover Chester Kallman,
“He had begun to sense that he had caused the break between them by trying to
reshape Kallman into an ideal figure, an imaginary lover who he valued more
than the real one. What Auden had thought of as love for the younger man had
been infected by libido domanandi, a
lust for the power to transform him into someone else.” Personality is a subject
that can drown the words of a brilliant poet in jargonese. But Eliot’s famous
remarks about the impesonaity of the artist in "Tradition and the Individual Talent” not withstanding Mendelson’s quirky view of Auden turns out to
be an exception in the often turgid world of literary biography. It’s a form of
poetry in and of itself. And his
observation about Auden’s relationship with Kallman makes one think in general about the nature of love. Eliza Doolittle
finally rejects Henry Higgins in Pygmalion.
All his work has gone for nought, but in actuality doesn't this transformative process goes on in most relationships in which the self
is often shaped by its interaction with either the expressed or subliminal wishes of others?
Labels:
Auden,
Eliot,
Kallman,
Pygmalion,
Tradition and the Individual Talent
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
The Influence of Anxiety
![]() |
| Franz Kafka
Harold Bloom wrote a famous book called The Anxiety of Influence. The subject was really the weight the past holds over the present.
Eliot also wrote Tradition and the Individual Talent which treated a similar
subject in terms of the impersonality of the artistic sensibility. But what
about a tome called The Influence of Anxiety or The Anxiety of Anxiety? In
order to sell, the book would have to deal with some famously anxiously
individuals, Kierkegaard in philosophy, Bergman in film and Kafka in
literature, but such a book would probably derive its greatest power from
dealing with the average Joe. After all anxiety is a great motivator. In
Manhattan children grow up anxious and they read the anxiety on their parents
faces when their early rejection from pre-schools presages a long life of pink
slips and unfulfilled dreams. They face further anxiety when they grow into
adolescence and realize the symbols of male and female sexuality they
see in advertising, films and television have little to do with their actual
anxiety fraught interactions with the opposite sex (this is one of their first
experiences of meta-anxiety or the anxiety of anxiety). Later in life they will
go through anxiety about the fate of their IRA’s or retirement plans, realizing
that in a bull market theirs has the singular distinction of having been
managed by a bear. Anxiety comes in big time when they themselves become
parents, burdening their own children with the task of living out a parent's unfulfilled dreams—a task that most children deal with by openly rebelling
against the unreasonable expectations that have been placed on them. Bloom’s The
Anxiety of Influence was an important book, but The Influence of Anxiety will
be a blockbuster that'll make its author rich enough to pay for an unlimited
supply of serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
|
Labels:
Bergman,
Bloom,
Eliot,
Kafka,
Kierkegaard,
The Anxiety of Influence
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Rivers (Not Larry)
And Quiet Flows the Don was a novel by the Russian novelist Mikhail Sholokhov. Remember it. You’re likely one of the few. But rivers have been
great sources of inspiration both to artists and plain folks. Moses was floated
down the Nile and the rest is history. In a similar life saving intervention
Romulus and Remus were sent down the Tiber and ended up founding Rome. The
River Liffey running through Dublin was a source of inspiration to Joyce and "riverrun" is the first word(s) of Finnegan's Wake. The
Thames inspired Eliot’s Wasteland (“Sweet Thames, run softly, til I end my song"). The Vlatava river, the
longest in the Czech Republic, would eventually carry Vaclav Havel's coffin. The
Danube is so ubiquitous a source of inspiration that one hesitates, for fear of
sounding obvious, to make the citations. We have the temperamental Arno, whose
waters flow down from the gentle hills which surround Florence and there’s
the Hudson, without which there'd be no Hudson River Valley or Hudson River
School of painting. A New Curve in the Ganges: Mohatma Gandhi’s Study of Hinduism was a book by Arvi Scharma and finally let’s not forget the Mississippi without which we probably never would have
heard of a fellow named Mark Twain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

-black_bg.jpg)


