Monday, May 5, 2025

Cosmically Yawning




Non-existence, no sentience are hard notions to absorb and conditions from which no one, not Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un, Xi Jinping, Victor Orban nor any of their predecessors, Stalin, Hitler, Idi Amin or Pinochet are exempt. It’s “Alas, Poor Yorick” territory. Very hard to imagine desire and volition absent a la Jaques' “Seven Stages of Man” which ends “sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything.” Yes the universe is cosmically indifferent, but it can’t snub you, if you’re no longer there.


listen to "Shake Your Groove Thing" by Peaches and Herb

Friday, May 2, 2025

My Dinner With Adolf




Larry David satirized Bill Maher’s bright words about Trump ("My Dinner With Adolf,"
NYT, 4/21/25). Mahr’s equanimity (following a White House visit) sounds a little like Chamberlain's “I just had another conversation with Chancellor Herr Hitler…” speech before the invasion of the Sudetenland. Smerconish took exception to the humor. Trump isn’t Hitler was Smerconish’s argument. It diminishes the horror of The Holocaust to make such comparisons. But Trump is Hitler, in fact he is worse since he portrays himself as the jolly green giant while he summarily destroys everything in his path. Didn’t Trump once say he could walk down Fifth Avenue and kill? Isn’t that exactly what he is doing?

 




Is it an understatement to call Fellini's  (1963) phallocentric? One might emerge from the current revival at Film Forum feeling the movie a parody of itself. There's lots of satire. All the aspirational actresses including the ravishing Claudia Cardinale are parodic figures. But life is a circus, with the director, as the ring leader. So the answer is no.  is not making fun of its central figure. As its title indicates it is the film between La Dolce Vita (1960) and Juliet of the Spirits (1965) and it reveals the workings of Guido (Marcello Mastroianni) and by proxy Fellini's imagination. Does  hold up? The answer is yes and no and that ambiguity may account for the sublime enjoyment that lies in seeing it after all these years, in all its black and white glory.


 

Thursday, May 1, 2025

The Art of the Deal For Dummies






“I love you dear. Can you just hold me?”

“Sure after I tie you up.”

“Can we talk about our feelings?”

“If you let me choke you, like that character in the Sally Rooney novel.”
   
Donald Trump's mega best seller, The Art of the Deal has sparked discussions in households across the country. When you look at love as a transaction, negotiation becomes the foreplay. Americans have come a long way from the old saw, Tell em you love em then you lay 'em . Now what sexually active couples are doing is bargaining. Say you want to gag your loved one or slap and hit them. Say you like being bitten and are proud of the hickeys on your neck. Whatever you want to do or want done to you is a potential bargaining chip. Say you want to be suffocated? The psychoanalyst Charles Brenner coined the term "compromise formation." In order to arrive at a particular result with another human being, you always have to ask for More!!!! In the present negotiations over tariffs, Trump has threatened to annex other trading partners--like Canada--in order to arrive at a favorable balance of trade. The comparable behavior when it comes to couples would be overtly dominating and possessive behavior. What is the final result? The answer is a kind of bickering and nagging which creates homeostasis.

listen to "Shake Your Groove Thing" by Peaches and Herb