The bottom line is that after two years of turmoil beginning
in the winter of 2011 Mohammed Morsi remains under what the Times describes as "indefinite detention," Hosni Mubarak
has moved from jail to house arrest “Mubarak to Be Transferred to House Arrest,” NYT, 8/21/13) and the military is still in power. These are the events that are narrated in Jehane Noujaim’s documentary, The Square, currently playing at Film
Forum. Of course, the title referring to Cairo’s Tahir Square, the epicenter of
unrest during the initial rebellion against the Mubarak
dictatorship, also conjures up the memory of Tiananmen Square, where the
Chinese movement was crushed in l989. Politically, both Arab Spring, of which
the Egyptian uprising was a part, and the early rebellion in China both emanated from the same impulse--the struggle for human rights. The Square is a jeremiad since it betokens the tragic fate of many
freedom movements in which resistance to authoritarianism becomes so
ideologized that it spawns its own forms of repression. That’s what’s happening in Syria where Al-Qaeda and
other fundamentalist factions have co-opted the opposition. Who knows if
parliamentary democracy would have been the product of a successful people’s
revolution against the party elite in China? The narrative of The Square is told in microcosm through
the eyes of Ahmed, a streetwise agitator, Khalid an actor (who has starred in
films like The Kite Runner) and
Magdy, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, the most torn of all the characters,
precisely due to a political agenda—which increasingly puts him at odds with
his confreres. The Square
recapitulates the sickening history of freedom movements from the Russian
Revolution on, with the early millenarian fervor attendant upon shocking
degrees of naivete. While one has to admire the courage of the protestors, one
wants to give them a history lesson—or two. Have they never heard of an Italian
sociologist named Vilfredo Pareto and his concept of “the circulation of the elites?” Have they never
heard the expression that that power is conservative and self-perpetuating, no
matter how lofty the ideals it seeks to uphold? The film is rather
straightforward and earnest, but there’s one exception and that’s the intermittent cross cuts to a mural that’s constantly being painted by an unidentified hand.
This brilliant little touch links the film to the works of painters as varied
as Goya, Orozco and Picasso and their narratives of human suffering.
Friday, November 1, 2013
The Square
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great insight into the problem with 'revolutions' which so often substitute one power structure for another, with the citizens as the losers.
ReplyDeleteThe 'Tank Man' video is one of the most moving and profoundly heroic depictions of human spirit I've ever seen and offers an interesting strategy for protestors. A thousand (or million) angry voices are a mob, but one person confronting power is a potent symbol and one that despotic institutions are reluctant to quash publicly.
'Democracy' has become, in this country, a winner-takes-all power grab and the inherent problem is that there is no braking mechanism to prevent an angry and misinformed public, manipulated by clever public relations fear-mongering, from taking control.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOf course, there will always be revolutions and fervor and hope. One can’t dispense with hope. It’s almost a biological prerogative. However what is disconcerting is the path of destruction left in their wake and also the fact that like with divorce, populations seem to be marrying themselves to what is for all intensive purposes the same leader again and again
ReplyDelete