Flaubert once said “Be
regular and orderly in your life like a bourgeois, so that you may be violent
and original in your work.” In an essay entitled “Chekhov’s Enlightenment”(The
New Criterion, November 2012) Gary Saul Morson comments, “What really set
Chekhov apart from other intellectuals, including most today, were his openly
petit-bourgeois values. I can think of no other great writer who so
forthrightly defended middle class virtues as a prerequisite for human dignity.
Medicine suited him, not only because of his acute sensitivity to human
suffering but also because of the high value it accorded to proper habits,
respect for one’s surrounding, and, most bourgeois of all good hygiene.” Thus the very title of Morson’s essay should be taken with a grain of salt. Rather than Enlightenment figures like Locke, you
might say that Chekhov had more in common with Edmund Burke to the
extent that his skepticism and anti-millenarianism were rooted in the doctor’s
understanding of the complexity of pathology and the fact there weren’t always
simple remedies (a.k.a. enlightened solutions) for every malady. Morson
quotes Chekhov thusly on the trendy progressive poseurs of his day, “Our young
ladies and political beaux are pure fools…all their inactivity sanctity and
purity are based on hazy and naïve sympathies and antipathies to individuals
and labels, not to facts. It’s easy to be pure when you hate the Devil you
don’t know and love the God you wouldn’t have brains enough to doubt.”
Turgenev’s Basarov was the perfect model for this kind of dictatorship of the intellectual. In his famous lines from “The Second Coming,” Yeats iterated the
humanity of a similar sensibility, “The best lack all conviction while the
worst/ Are full of passionate intensity.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.