What about that baby in Carrie Cracknell’s Young Vic production of A Doll’s House at BAM? You don’t see too many live babies on stage these
days and this one was remarkably well behaved. However besides the baby, the
production has much to commend it including Hattie Morahan in what can only be
defined as a phenomenological interpretation of the character of Nora, to the extent
that it doesn’t address her femininity or lack thereof, but the confines of her
being. Actually the current production centers around both Morahan’s
Nora and the family friend, Dr. Rank (Steve Toussaint). There are three key
scenes in this regard. In the first Nora reveals her big secret to an old
childhood crony, Kristine (Caroline Martin), a widow left with “not even grief for a sense of loss to nurture." For the sake of present happiness Nora's mortgaged her future. In plain terms she’s signed a fraudulent loan to
accommodate a yearlong trip to Italy. Whether she's making a sacrifice for
Torvald (Dominic Rowan) who has been ill or merely using his illness as an excuse is
ambiguous. Supposedly it’s her husband who treats her like a child addressing
her as his “hamster,” his “skylark,” his “humming bird,” his “most treasured
possession,” but her actions are plainly impulsive and childish and a
reflection of her own ability to quell her appetites. Ingmar Bergman’s production of A Doll’s House, which
played at BAM a number of years ago emphasized the notion of self-realization.
The Bergman Nora could have been a man as well as a woman. But the brilliance
of this Nora is the way it’s influenced by Hedda Gabler, introducing the death instinct in its exploration of the feminine
mystique. The two scenes exploring Rank’s being both occur with
Nora. In the first he talks about life as fulfilling the need “to continue
feeling tormented.” In the second he unveils another layer of the onion. He’s
consumed with love and is critically ill. While Nora is lying, Rank is dying. These
two leitmotifs say more about the play
then the famous denouement when Nora walks out--which considering the modernity of
the interpretations provided seems almost anticlimactic. Yes, Torvald’s
narcissism and selfishness are revealed. Nora is just a piece of the puzzle.
But so what? Is Nora any less
directorial and narcissistic in her machinations. The revelation is almost Newtonian
in a production that’s well situated in the world of relativity. The rotating
set is like an old vinyl record revolving on a turntable and the feeling it
creates is one of synchronicity. Rather than a succession of
epiphanic moments, the varying scenes unfold complete and complex lives. The
circularity is mirrored in Morahan’s rendition of the play’s famed tarantella
which foreshadows her so-called liberation. The current A Doll’s House, with its emphasis on subjectivity and intention, is
a brilliant and out of the box approach to the Ibsen classic.
Showing posts with label A Doll’s House. Show all posts
Showing posts with label A Doll’s House. Show all posts
Monday, March 10, 2014
Friday, November 15, 2013
Codependent Yes More
![]() |
Photograph of Hendrik Ibsen by Gustav Borgen |
Melody Beattie’s Codependent No More: How to Stop Controlling Others and Start Caring For Yourself is one of the bibles of the recovery movement and it reflects a sentiment that's a product of an age in which the jargon by which some relationships end is an assertion of psychic real estate, “I need my own space.” Everyone wants to
be free to maximize their potential (it’s virtually an epidemic) and dependency is looked at as a
straightjacket that inhibits individual growth. But actually dependency can be
loads of fun. If Codependent No More sold millions of copies, the
anti-Christ for dependedaphobes might be CoDependent Yes More. One of the basic tenets of such a volume might be that
being entwined and enmeshed produces shared memory and
experience. Today many married couples live separate lives. There are many couples who see
each other less than people who simply date. Everyone is so busy fulfilling
their potential that they have no time for each other. Nothing is deemed more
horrible than one person sacrificing their chance to be the person they always
wanted to be for the sake of the relationship. But is being the person you
always wanted to be always so great. As far back as the l9th Century, Henrik
Ibsen realized that self-realization could be a two edged sword. A Doll’s House
shows the negative side of co-dependency, but Ibsen seemed to become chastened
by his own experience. Later plays like The Master Builder are ambivalent towards the search. Striving for greatness, which can be the obverse of self-hatred, is not always what it’s cracked up to be. Solness, the creative who is the hero
of Ibsen’s Master Builder who seeks to build “castles in the sky,” also
resembles Icarus whose wings melted when he flew too close to the sun.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)