So much has been written about The Post and the story of the Pentagon Papers, along with the
Watergate, is so much a part of the mythology of the Nixon administration that
any commentary runs the risk of being redundant. But as a piece of
entertainment and an example of the sophisticated popularization of history
with which Steven Spielberg has become associated, it’s interesting to look at
the movie in the way one might an essay say like the great essay by A.J.P.
Taylor on The Origins of the Second World War. As a director and a conveyor of
information Spielberg has many talents but one might be termed the "cadence of disquisition." Scene one of the movie takes place with an American unit
being ambushed and facing grave casualties in Vietnam. The morning after Daniel Ellsberg is spotted
with his typewriter, providing the grist for the mill, the raw observation that
would one day become the infamous Pentagon Papers. We then are presented with
some key statistics such as the fact that 70% of the reason for America’s
involvement was to save face, when in fact military victory was only a l0%
possibility. At the same time, a totally different subplot unravels concerning
a public offering of Washington Post
stock that becomes the McGuffin. The presses roll and the headlines pop out in the style of 30’s movies, but the paper’s survival is at stake. It's the old silent film montage shot of the train coming with the heroine tied to the tracks. And finally there’s the famous
ruling in which the Justice Black declares, “The press was to serve the
governed, not the governors.” “I think we may have a burglary in progress in the
Watergate,” says a security guard with a flashlight. It’s the last line of the
movie and the director’s Q.E.D.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.