If there were a genre called business science fiction and
fantasy (a mixture of Philip K. Dick and Malcolm Gladwell), then Azam Ahmed’s
recent Times story about the infamous
trade that put JP Morgan in the hole for a cool 2 billion and climbing (“The Hunch, the Pounce and the Kill,” NYT, 5/26/12) would definitely qualify.
Consider the tale’s protagonists: Boaz Weinstein, Chrysler building based hedge
fund trader, one time Stuyvesant High school grad, chess wunderkind and card
shark who Warren Buffet once invited to a poker tournament and JP Morgan’s
Bruno Iksil, aka “the London whale,” so named for what Ahmed described as
“his outsize trades.” Iksil wasn’t Melville’s Great Whale, a creature who would
have posed a slightly greater challenge in both life and art. He turned out to
be easier prey for Boaz. When the initial reports of the JP Morgan loss
originally appeared, most of the attention in the press concerned bank
regulation. Here was 2008 with one of the most prominent and profitable
financial institutions in America, taking a huge blow for trading in area that
many think should be off limits to banks. However, the exact nature of the
losses and what they derived from remained somewhat of a mystery. Even more
important however was the fact that JP Morgan didn’t exist in a bubble. The
bank’s loss had to be someone else’s gain. “The resulting uproar, in Washington
and on Wall Street, has largely obscured a simple truth of the marketplace,”
Azam Ahmed remarked. “Yes, Morgan lost big—but, as Mitt Romney has pointed out,
someone else won. And that someone or, rather, those someones, turn out to be
Boaz Weinstein and a wolf pack of like-minded hedge fund managers. In the
London Whale, these traders saw a rich opportunity, and they seized it with
both hands. That, after all, is the way hedge funds roll.” Like all fantasy
fiction, there still is something unearthly about all of this, and for the lay
person, who is likely to be stunned by all the zero’s, it’s the question, how
does it all happen? Credit default swaps and synthetic derivatives still read
like supernatural forces to those who aren’t versed in their workings. To the
many who don’t understand these esoteric financial instruments, which are to
financial journalists on the prowl for scoops what leveraged buyouts were in
the 80’s, they’re the mysterious dark energy of the business world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.