In Syria and Iraq the young are killed by ideologies, by
other minds. In America, it is the mind that kills. “Why Do Doctors Commit Suicide?” (NYT, 9/4/14)
was the title of a Times Op-ed piece by a recent medical school
graduate, Pranay Sinha. Why would a graduate of a top
university who has succeeded in being accredited in one of the world’s most
respected professions end his or her life? And it’s not only about medicine. There
was a period when Sweden, a country which provided semi-Utopian conditions to its citizens, experienced the highest suicide rate in the world (Sweden no
longer heads the list). Can we hypothesize that perhaps a society where outward cares are
less an issue becomes more inward turning? And is this not somehow the case
with America where the jihad can come from within? In his famous Suicide: A Study in Sociology Emile Durkheim argued that suicide was less evident in highly structured
societies. One wonders about the prevalence of suicide in the Taliban
controlled portions of Afghanistan, among Boko Haram in Nigeria and naturally
ISIS and al-Qaeda controlled territories. However, horrible the idea, can we
say that jihad itself, with its hatred of the other, is an insurance against
self-annihilation (with the exception obviously of suicide bombers)? And is it possible to conclude that in societies like Sweden and the United States which preach
tolerance and freedom, and which demand relatively little social conformity,
that the thanatos or death drive which Freud described as a natural
part of life (Todestrieb) is more
likely to be unleashed on the self?
Showing posts with label Suicide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Suicide. Show all posts
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Friday, February 15, 2013
Suicide
![]() |
| Emile Durkheim
“In l738, a journalist (possibly Samuel Richardson) claimed
that suicide was England’s 'new religion,'” Freya Johnston remarks a TLS review of three tomes on suicide,
Kelly McGuire’s Dying to be English,
Paul Seaver et al, editors, The History of Suicide in England, 1650-1850 and Richard Bell’s We Shall Be No More (“Suicide Watch,” TLS, 1/18/13). “Melancholy seemed to infect everyone and
everything: even a sedan chair, narrating the history of its life and
adventures in London in l757, admits that it has flirted with self destruction:
‘Since my reparation, I have had a very particular dejection of spirits.
Whether I am almost tired of a foolish and ridiculous world, I can’t tell…’”
Shakespeare reflects the suicidal British temperament. Hamlet was suicidal,
Ophelia drowns (and there has always been a debate about whether it was suicide or accident), Othello did it along with both Romeo and Juliet. Of course another English
great, Virginia Woolf, would drown herself. Hume, Johnston points out, condoned
suicide while “Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language (1755)
condemns the act in its definition of “SUICIDE:” “Self-murder, the horrid crime
of destroying one's self.” Not that the English have any monopoly on suicide,
which has been particularly prevalent amongst American poets including Anne Sexton, John Berryman and Sylvia Path. Amongst the Italians Primo Levi survived Auschwitz only to take his life after the war (although there are those who have cast doubts on whether his fall from his Turin residence was suicide or not). Cesare Pavese, a noted editor and writer, also killed himself. And speaking of melancholy Danes, the
Swedes were always known for their high incidence of suicide despite all the
entitlements of the welfare state. Albert Camus famously began The Myth of Sisyphus by saying, “There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.”And the French sociologist, Emile Durkheim, wrote a book on the
subject tersely titled Suicide, in
which he attempted to isolate factors such as religious belief, marital status, sex and education, which contributed to suicide. Protestants he concluded were more
likely to commit suicide than Catholics or Jews.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


