Ernest Jones’s Hamlet and Oedipus illustrated one of Freud’s most cherished theories—at the time a
shocker which belied the notion of childhood in innocence in asserting that
young boys might want to kill their father and sleep with their mother. In our
age of Queer Theory you don’t often hear such classic psychoanalytic paradigms
anymore. The work of Ernst Kris and Phyllis Greenacre, two prominent analysts
who wrote cogently on art and literature, has been eclipsed by that of thinkers like Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari and their Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia which is much sexier today. But sometimes
old paradigms come in handy. Take for instance a late Shakespeare Play like The Winter’s Tale. Most readers push back
when it comes to the precipitous behavior of King Leontes. He’s murderously
jealous like Othello, but there’s no Iago with the “motiveless malignity” that
Coleridge once described. It’s hard to figure out what is going on. But let’s
look at the plot through a classic psychoanalytic lens. Could we say that Leontes
is troubled by his homosexual feelings towards Polixenes, a friend since childhood, and that his jealousy results from his projecting them onto Hermione? As you may recall he'd enlisted her into trying to convince
Polixenes to stay in Sicily, but is it simply her fervidness that sets him off? That
there's no reason for his anguish is the point. It’s neurotic. If Leontes had been in
therapy he might have discovered that there was no need to be so afraid of his
own wishes. You hear textual and cultural interpretations, but these kinds of
psychoanalytic insights, which have fallen by the wayside, can be helpful in
understanding complex characters like Hamlet and Leontes, whose behavior, on the
surface, seems to defy explanation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.